Any new innovations, blog it here. Welcome to Innovativ Blog. From the simple rotatation of the wheel, the invention of a transistor, advances in radio communication, almost any action & any tangible thing can possibly be automated. In what way will the future manifest? Blog your creative thoughts here!!! As development communications professionals, we try to keep our finger on the pulse for new ways of working and sector-specific advances. In the vast majority of cases, the poor are left out of new innovations for some time, at least until they become dramatically more affordable for them. Exploring advancements in technology, transportation, education, health care, finance and energy.
There are always inventions that seem unattainable for the time in which we live. This may be because the technology has not advanced enough or doesn't exist. Perhaps it is impossible (a time machine seems pretty far off in the future). There are also always innovations that are not successful until the next century. For example, Thomas Edison's light bulb wasn't really useful until 40 years later when electric utilities were stable and profitable.
So, what new innovations are people working on now? What innovations are going to change how you live your everyday life?
Here's a description of 32 Innovations That Will Change Your Tomorrow that I found on The NY Times' website. It splits the innovations into six categories: Morning Routine, Commute, Work, Play, Health, and Home. I'm just going to pick a few of my favorites to discuss, but you should definitely read up on the rest.
Number 4: The Morning Multi-Tasker
'The problem with laptops and tablets, says Mark Rolston of the design firm Frog, is that they’re confined by a screen. He wants to turn the entire room into a monitor, where you can have the news on your kitchen table while you place a video call on your fridge. And when you’re done, you can swipe everything away, like Tony Stark in “Iron Man.” Clay Risen
I think the picture on the website will help to understand this innovation the best.
I haven't decided if this is something I really would like to see. It seems a bit extreme for the internet to be so integrated into out daily lives. Already I rely very heavily on my phone and laptop. I'm not sure how a room being turned into a monitor would affect my psyche.
Number 16: Your Body, Your Login
'A team of Dutch and Italian researchers has found that the way you move your phone to your ear while answering a call is as distinct as a fingerprint. You take it up at a speed and angle that’s almost impossible for others to replicate. Which makes it a more reliable password than anything you’d come up with yourself. (The most common iPhone password is “1234.”) Down the line, simple movements, like the way you shift in your chair, might also replace passwords on your computer. It could also be the master key to the seven million passwords you set up all over the Internet but keep forgetting.' Chris Wilson
With this innovation projected to be only two years away our relationship with technology is only going to be strengthened. I definitely would be happy to not have to remember so many passwords. However, this also worries me because I don't want to be too dependent on all this technology. I also wonder how accurate this can be, as I don't see how it's possible for me to move my phone to my ear the exact same way every time or move in my chair the exact same way. I don't want to be locked out of my computer because I can't seem to move in it the right way.
Number 20: A World Without Hangovers
'Researchers at Imperial College London are closing in on a formula for a new kind of booze — synthetic alcohol, it’s called — that would forever eliminate the next morning’s headache (not to mention other problems associated with drinking). The team, led by David Nutt, a psychiatrist and former British drug czar, has identified six compounds similar to benzodiazepines — a broad class of psychoactive drugs — that won’t get you rip-roaring drunk but will definitely provide a buzz. According to Nutt, the alcohol substitute would be a flavorless additive that you could put in a nonalcoholic drink. And when you want to sober up, all you’d have to do is pop a pill.' Clay Risen
I think the implications with this are pretty clear. I probably wouldn't want to waste my time or money with this synthetic alcohol, but that's because I already am not much of a drinker. It seems like it would be quite useful for others though. Popping a pill to sober up sounds like a simple solution. What do you think? Real alcohol or synthetic?
'In February, Chaotic Moon Labs began testing a robotic shopping cart that acts a bit like a mind-reading butler. To start it up, you can text message the cart’s built-in tablet computer. Now it knows who you are and what you need for dinner. The cart uses Microsoft’s Kinect motion-sensor technology to track and follow you through the store, pointing you — in a synthy voice reminiscent of a G.P.S. navigator — toward products on your list. The system will also warn you if you’ve added something that violates your dietary restrictions. Still only a prototype, the cart isn’t nearly as nimble as its human-powered cousin, but it does have one main advantage. Items you add to the cart can be automatically scanned, and you can finalize your purchase from the device, skipping the checkout line entirely.' Farhad Manjoo
This shopping cart will change the way in which we do grocery shopping. It is right in line with our fast paced society. Imagine a grocery store without people and just shopping carts...Perhaps that's a bit extreme. Still, the advantages of this shopping cart are pretty evident.
It’s depressing to think how much food packaging there is in your kitchen right now — all those juice cartons, water bottles and ice-cream containers. But what if you could eat them? “We’ve got to package in the same way nature does,” says a Harvard bioengineer named David Edwards. And so he has devised a way to convert foods into shell-like containers and films that he calls Wikicells. Yogurt will be encased in a strawberry pouch, for instance. You could wash and eat the packaging, like the skin of an apple, or you could toss it, like the peel of an orange, since it’s biodegradable. The newly wrapped ice cream and yogurt will be available later this month at the lab store in Paris, with juice and tea coming within the next year or two.Nathaniel Penn
This is one of my favorites because of how simple the idea is. You would no longer have to deal with throwing out containers and packaging. Right now I sort through packaging to see what parts I can recycle. With this innovation that would be unnecessary. Just eat the package or throw it out (compost perhaps?).
I hope that this post made you reflect a bit on future. Many of these things are not all that far away (with in the next 5 years). It is incredible to see what humans can do with constant thought, to see what innovations come out of it, and to see how they are going to shape our future.
New Innovations Login
- Article
- March 06, 2012
Related Articles
Pre-Occupied
Peter Wood examines the theatrical anger of the Occupy Wal...Mobbing For Preferences
Peter Wood discusses students' live-action defense of ra...Yes Minister and Foreign Students
Carol Iannone, the Editor-at-Large of our journal Academic...The House of Representatives is going to pass today a bill (H.R. 2117) that would forbid two regulatory initiatives of the Obama administration. The first relates to the definition of a student credit-hour, while the second deals with the requirement that all online programs must get authorization in each of the 50 states to operate. The only interesting thing about today’s vote is how many Democrats will vote with the GOP. The number could be very substantial, since virtually the entire higher-education establishment, led by the American Council of Education, wants the bill passed. The Obama administration is “strongly opposed” to the measure, but has not explicitly said it would veto it if it were the pass the U.S. Senate.
This is a classic case of regulatory overreach. The definition of a student credit hour has long been an elusive matter, with most persons agreeing that “clock hours”—actual minutes in formal instruction—is at best an crude proxy for the effort and extent of learning involved in courses. This is doubly true in a world of online education, collaborative learning ventures, etc. But the big issue here is: why shouldn’t this matter be left to others, such as the states with respect to funded public universities, or to the accrediting agencies?
Innovation Uk
Ironically, on state authorization the Feds take the opposite tack, requiring 50 separate approvals for some school trying to offer online courses nationally. This is an outrageously inefficient and costly procedure, and violates the spirit if not the letter of the interstate commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution. As long ago as Gibbons v. Ogden(1824) the Supreme Court put limits on state authority over matters of interstate commerce. This is Luddite regulation, an attempt to raise the cost of promising technologies. Designed, I suspect, to slow the growth of hated (by the Obama administration) for-profit education, it threatens promising new innovations, creates barriers to entry, etc. It is simply awful.
But the broader issue is: Why should the creative, competitive, and generally successful (if excessively costly) system of decentralized higher education be abandoned and regulatory power be turned over to a faceless Washington bureaucracy? Do Department of Education functionaries in D.C. know what is best for the residents of Hawaii located over 4,000 miles away?
This is an election year, and when one significant presidential hopeful, Rick Santorum, causes a stir attacking the Obama “college for everyone” policy, you know that higher-education issues are becoming more important in the contest than ever before. The Obama administration’s overreach may prove counterproductive not only educationally but politically as well.
This article originally appeared on the Chronicle of Higher Education's Innovations blog on February 28, 2012.
Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.